-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/11 07:25, Eric wrote: >> From: paranormal <aka...@yandex.ru> > [SNIP] >> This is good idea. But beautiful port portupgrade :), >> not work with 1.9 version. > > What about ports/144605 - "[PATCH] Get ports-mgmt/portupgrade to build under > Ruby 1.9.1" > > I've not tried it, but does that patch do what it says on the tin?
[...] > There are plenty of outstanding PRs regarding portupgrade, which does seem > to suffer from being both loved and unloved (in terms of maintenance). I > personally use it, but am wondering if it's time to switch to Doug's > PortMaster now... However given that portupgrade is often noted in > documentation as almost the default tool for doing upgrades of ports then it > does seem sensible that we should all try our best to fix it. > > I personally think we should still aim to get to the default of 1.9 and > aiming for the 9.0 release seems a sensible target to go for, if part of > that process would seem to be getting portupgrade sorted then so be it. Portupgrade is a bit of a problem. Perhaps it's due to my patches, but at the moment I can't get databases/ruby-bdb to build with RUBY_VER == 1.9. If I could get past that, I could test the above PR. I wonder if anyone else has the same issue. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNgpCgAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhnJwIAKb6zi1w0lFm8upRzcOC84xx taTI7wNxijVsAlNzWqbL0Py/R30e0q5MihlGJfCBtmDna89b2TO8HgO0Xtiy0AdP pB1bejm0tpyziKaOQTxIsTK5gHo/GcXtTnLQghn7xmdX6Ahyec6PxXjcrX1CeQWC HDRj+tgBOwSLTQ7VXCkbsPCvQRK2M8RT4yYkYskSUYqNmigRCFHgBLuMNbSranaR KtZh9FbfMZqIEkarMxQMqeusewPhI3G/EJTAwtImuYfQectH9rZSClFE66aRzXft DdnupcAyE1DbW4wVR+Jrq3Ek8c1srAWWH1NUY6J/zYZZ1WPqIIOceFteR64MyH8= =a4O3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
