On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31:36 -0700 milki <mi...@rescomp.berkeley.edu> mentioned:
> On 13:42 Wed 16 Mar , Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > > I've been hanging out at #bsdports@efnet and I've gathered that is the > > > consensus of committers that portupgrade is no longer maintained and > > > portmaster is the preferred tool. The docs need some patching to reflect > > > this. > > > > > > > It's not true, it's officially maintained by ruby@, which for portupgrade > > was effectively mainly me for the past years. Unfortunately, I don't have > > enough resources to make significant changes there. > > Given that there are so many PRs and I emailed the official maintainer > (ruby@) with a small 2 line patch suggestion and received no feedback, > I'd say its pretty good as not maintained. Well, I just wanted to point out that officially it's maintained (at least I try to keep it working). The quality of maintainership is another question, and I agree that it's not acceptable. Unfortunately, none else stepped in to provide a mainteinership level of support after sem@ resigned. It certainly need a lot of love and care. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
