well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash actualy it doesnt do anything :)
(damit pressed reply again instead of reply all) On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:53:11 +0200, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash > actualy it doesnt do anything :) > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:21:48 -0400, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:18 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > > And which one do you recommend ? > > > > > linux-flashplugin6, but try both and see which works better for you. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:06:37 -0400, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > >> > > >>> Can somebody tell me the difference between > > >>> > > >>> /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-firefox > > >> > > >> Uses graphics/libflash (which is a GPL) > > >> > > >>> and > > >>> > > >>> /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > >> > > >> Uses www/linux-flashplugin6 from macromedia > > >> > > >> Michael > > >> > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
