On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 14:24, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:31:32AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT users > > > > hear this. Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that are > > > > bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users. > > > > > > > > > > I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly about > > > major events over in the ports tree. > > > > I've started doing this. The full summary was sent to ports@ and > > ports-developers@, plus I added a copy to /usr/ports/CHANGES. This is > > now the second major ports update I've summarized. Once the archives > > get back up to speed, you should be able to see my previous summary. > > > > A quick comment and question re the ports tree. > Since the ./distinfo file began listing the "SIZE=" > line, my portupgrade scripts (and fetch) have broken > when I upgrade. I'm running 4.7PRE and 4.8PRE. (I'm > trying to floppy install 5.2-RELEASE, as well.) > > Do I need to get a new version of fetch? Hand-deleting > the SIZE line in the ./distinfo file is a temp > workaround; is there a better way? ...I must have > missed *something*........
The latest bsd.port.mk changes should have fixed this. The -S argument is only passed to fetch i OSVERSION >= 480000. If you're still running into problems, try adding DISABLE_SIZE=yes to /etc/make.conf. Joe > > gary > > -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
