On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:03:57 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: > On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: > > Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as > > open? > > > > o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of > > IPv6 host data > > It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit > bit. Yet.
This deficiency was mentioned on the Postfix forum <http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/cutoff=232317> recently. The PR was filed nearly a year ago. I would have thought that by now someone would have given some thought to committing it BEFORE they continue to pump out new versions of FreeBSD. Just my take on the matter. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Forbes Thought Of The Day “When a man tells you he got rich through hard work, ask him: Whose?” — Don Marquis
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
