On 24/09/2012 22:29, Jerry wrote: > Is there any specific reason that this PR: 161548 is still marked as > open? > > o 2011/10/13 bin/161548 [patch] getent(1) inconsistent treatment of IPv6 host > data
It simply hasn't attracted the attention of anyone with a src commit
bit. Yet.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
