20.06.2012 00:06, Anonymous Remailer (austria) пишет: >> GPL protects the freedom of the programmer who licensed his >> code under those licenses: He wants it to be free for use, >> but not to be turned into closed source products. > What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called > "forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open > your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball... > >> A programmer who does not want to raise this barrier will >> typically use the BSD license which is "more free". > No, it's just plain "free." > >> BSDL in opposite is often criticized a "rape me license". > No, it is not, except perhaps by lying atheist Marxist bastards and his > religious adherents. > >> It explicitely (!) allows creating derivates in a closed >> source manner. This means that parts of BSD licensed code >> can be a key component in a proprietary closed source >> product that is for sale (e. g. a firewall appliance), >> and nobody will find out about that fact. > Now you got it! GPL is about forcing people to do what /you/ want and BSD is > about letting them do what /they/ want. Let's see if you can guess which one > of those licenses is about freedom. Hint: freedom is not defined as forcing > people to do what you want. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > Mmmmm, all that rage, all that conspiracy crap and especially the hypocrisy! I love it, this is here, my friends, a daily dose of quality entertainment. P.S. Topic is pretty much dead
_______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
