On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 08:26:39AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <per...@apotheon.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote: > > > > > > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox. > > > > > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox. > > > > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under > > current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much > > difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are > > recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reason? > > Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In > fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the > killer feature.
Despite using Fluxbox for a number of years, I wasn't even aware of tabbing. The only thing I can think of tabbing is xterms but I use tmux for that. What do you use tabbing for? > > That, and it has a better license than OpenBox. > Never worried about the license. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html
pgpXrWh5dBJ3D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
