Jerry <freebsd.u...@seibercom.net> wrote: > > > Actually yes. Ignoring for a moment the reply you sent me > > > directly, conveniently bypassing the group forum, > > > > perry's message, like this one, was likely posted to you, cc the > > list. That's long been customary on freebsd lists, even this > > 'kindergarten' one; noone 'conveniently bypassed' anything. If you > > don't like private copies, sent as a courtesy, just delete them and > > move on. > > Wrong, it was sent directly, not CC'd. As per my stated policy, it was > answered/referred to on the list forum. I am seriously considering > changing that policy to also include reporting them as Spam.
Before making any such accusations, you had better make D@#% sure of your facts, lest you find yourself on the wrong end of a libel suit. My email client respects Reply-To: and I checked my logs just to be sure. That reply, as this one, was sent _only_ to the list. > No humor intended. I have read another post that might also describe > why the network is being blacklisted. I firmly believe that a diligent > SA (note the word diligent) could attempt to correct this problem. Others have sufficiently addressed this portion of your tirade, I think. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
