On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:34:32 -0400 Jerry <freebsd.u...@seibercom.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:22:35 -0700 > per...@pluto.rain.com <per...@pluto.rain.com> articulated: > > > Jerry <freebsd.u...@seibercom.net> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:01:28 -0500 > > > Martin McCormick <mar...@dc.cis.okstate.edu> articulated: > > > > ... our entire network is on the blacklist ... > > > > > > Why are you blacklisted? It seems correcting that problem > > > would be my first priority. > > > > Being a university, okstate.edu has students, most of whom are > > not in the CIS department or in any way under control of the CIS > > department's sysadmin. Need I say more? > > Actually yes. Ignoring for a moment the reply you sent me directly, > conveniently bypassing the group forum, are you implying that these > students are using the University's web mail for possible illegal > actions and no one is policing that action? He's suggesting that mail sent direct-to-mx from arbitrary university IP addresses is unlikely to be trustworthy. I presume that when the OP said our "entire network is on the blacklist", he meant that the university has put everything but it's own mailservers, into the Policy Blocklist, and that he is trying to run an unofficial mailserver. As regards the original question, unless I missed an RFC or Microsoft implemented something proprietary, you can't send outgoing mail through IMAP. The normal solution to the problem is to configure sendmail to relay through a submission server. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
