On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Freminlins <freminl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've read the responses and comments here, so don't think I'm ignoring > anyone because I haven't responded directly. > > I rebuilt xorg-server without HAL. I killed hal stone dead and started up > the new (i.e. old-skool) xorg. It all works fine. > > My mouse and keyboard work as specified in the xorg.conf file, rather than > in the new-fangled xml way of doing things or adding setxkbmap to my > xinitrc > file. I am also 18MB of RAM better off. Specifically for Adam, who asks a > rhetorical question about HAL, memory usage and top. The answer for me is > 18MB too much. > No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage. HAL has shared library's just like many other applications. > > My advice to anyone who has problems with X and HAL - rebuild xorg-server > without HAL (it doesn't take long), then start from that base. > > I have to say this HAL way of doing things is using a sledgehammer to crack > a nut. Sure X can be a bit horrible to configure, but HAL itself is ugly, > resource hungry and doesn't work 100%. It seems to be an example of > supposedly making things easier, except when it doesn't work. > This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM. > > Life is a calm blue ocean once again. > > MF. > > -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
