On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:51:10PM +0000, cpghost wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: > > >>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > > >>> yourself. > > >> > > >> What is the procedure to fix a logo? > > > > > > use send-pr(1), of course! > > > > > > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window > > > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, > > > no graphics) as logo. The only parameter would be choosing the > > > right distinctive font (let's call it the FreeBSD-Font) for it. > > > Was that suggested back then? We used to have a 'FreeBSD' image > > > on the old website. Perhaps that should have been used as a logo? > > > ANYTHING would have been better than that current ugly sex-toy. > > > > There were tens of submissions that just had the word 'FreeBSD'. > > Ah, good to know. Thank you. > > > The word > > 'FreeBSD' isn't a logo, or they looked crappy, so they lost. > > What about 'SONY' or 'IBM'? They are logos too. Granted, not as > long as 'FreeBSD', but a word doesn't disqualify as a logo just > because it's a word.
I wouldn't sweat (or trust my memory to remember) the details. Most of them definitely said "Free BSD" though. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere
pgp71WmURAV4u.pgp
Description: PGP signature