Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:06, Andrew P. wrote:
> >
> > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even 16/32 solutions.
>
> We got those in 2005: http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T1/index.xml
That's a little different than what Andrew was describing as
"multi-core," though. His definition was that it was exactly the same
as having that many separate CPUs. Sun's definition in the new
UltraSPARC chips is separate ALUs but other resources are not
duplicated. Perhaps most notably, there is only one floating point
unit shared between all of the cores on the chip.
Personally, I don't think there's a strong enough argument for one
definition to be "right" and the other "wrong," so you just have to be
aware which one you're using.
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
