--- Martin Cracauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at > 12:52:24PM -0400: > > > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better > (can't believe that they took > > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I > know that HyperThreading is > > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does > Dual Core get? > > It is the real thing, at least when it comes to > AMD64 and > Netburst-based Intel dual-cores. Every core > has a full set of own > caches just like dual CPU. Yonah (dual-core > Pentium-M) has a shared > L2 cache. > > I have benchmarks comparing dual-core 939 > socket systems against dual > 940 socket systems here: > http://cracauer-forum.cons.org/forum/crabench.html Just a question about your benches, any reason you just don't ship files to /dev/null? That was always the standard in unix to get the disk out of it. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
