Nikolas Britton wrote:
Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel,
normally I build my kernels the old school way?
I suspect it is only needed, when You want to rebuild Your custom
kernel, but haven't deleted
the /usr/src/sys/arch/compile/KERNCONF/ directory, so there is some old
junk.
Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about
-Os, safe to use?
So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3
-march=athlon64, the
building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process
afaik. There is
COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted
behaviour,
but haven't got any answers so yet.
The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device.
Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE
is commented out in the default kernel?
It's nice for me. I had a general protection fault, but I can't prove,
that ULE made that,
I had similar with 4BSD. FreeBSD 6 is quite stable for me when I don't
use my nve network
interface that has a poor driver.
Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported
to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec
HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x
----------
Feel free to add more questions to this thread.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
