> As far as -O2 as the default for the kernel... I thought it was more > important to have a small kernel then a faster but fatter one. The > smaller the kernel the more you can put in L1,2, and 3 cache and the > smaller the program the less it needs to hit ram, swap, and hard disk?
Just my opinion. I am not sure if, under realistic conditions, -O2 is better than -Os. Norbert _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
