On 6/28/15 1:07 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 27/06/2015 9:16 PM, David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
lang/pypy was originally set up to achieve:
* building of multiple pypy instances based on different setting (i.e. with
or without jit, sandboxing, etc). The port user could define any permutation
she desires.
* Install in a directory layout more similar to lang/python (i.e. libraries
in lib/, include files in include/).
I plan to simplify the port by removing the multi-instance support and using
the default directory layout of the port. This will fix issues with
virtualenv and reduce the learning curve of using/maintaining the port.
To this end does anyone:
a) use the multi-instance support?
b) depend on the current directory layout?
Based on feedback I will adapt my plans to simplify.
Regards
Thanks for opening up the question to the list David
My vote (without my python hat on) would be for lang/pypy being as close
to the upstream experience (freebsd improvements not withstanding) as
the possibly by default as that would be my expectation as a user
knowing nothing else.
From there work on additions or extensions, possibly as extra (slave)
ports or something similar
+1
Thanks Koobs & David!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
