On 27/06/2015 9:16 PM, David Naylor wrote: > Hi, > > lang/pypy was originally set up to achieve: > > * building of multiple pypy instances based on different setting (i.e. with > or without jit, sandboxing, etc). The port user could define any permutation > she desires. > > * Install in a directory layout more similar to lang/python (i.e. libraries > in lib/, include files in include/). > > I plan to simplify the port by removing the multi-instance support and using > the default directory layout of the port. This will fix issues with > virtualenv and reduce the learning curve of using/maintaining the port. > > To this end does anyone: > > a) use the multi-instance support? > > b) depend on the current directory layout? > > Based on feedback I will adapt my plans to simplify. > > Regards >
Thanks for opening up the question to the list David My vote (without my python hat on) would be for lang/pypy being as close to the upstream experience (freebsd improvements not withstanding) as the possibly by default as that would be my expectation as a user knowing nothing else. >From there work on additions or extensions, possibly as extra (slave) ports or something similar ./koobs _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
