> On 5. May 2021, at 18:56, Stefan Esser <s...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Am 05.05.21 um 18:00 schrieb Yasuhiro Kimura:
>> You misunderstand my intention. What I would like to do is to make a
>> port use security/openssl instead of base OpenSSL even if user sets
>> 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=base' in /etc/make.conf (or user doesn't
>> customize setting about ssl at all).
Stefan‘s suggestion is AFAIK the best we can do.
mail/opensmtpd has an example of that, but it still requires the user to
actively select the OpenSSL library (mixing OpenSSL libraries in a package set
is problematic).
Best,
Michael
>
> You can mark the port as broken if the user has selected "base" and
> this is incompatible with the port's requirements. E.g.:
>
> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>
> .if ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base
> BROKEN_FreeBSD_11= OpenSSL 1.1 required
> .endif
>
> .include <bsd.port.post.mk>
>
> You can of course add a better message, and the user can decide to
> try the compilation again after changing the default. But this will
> of course prevent the building of official packages for FreeBSD-11.
>
>> As I wrote previous mail, if 'USES=python:3.8+' is specified in
>> Makefile of a port, lang/python38 is used for the port event if user
>> adds 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7' in /etc/make.conf. I'm looking for
>> similar way about ssl setting.
>
> You could add a dependency on the openssl port and make sure, that
> the port's include file and library is used in preference of the
> base version on FreeBSD-11.
>
> But you have to consider the risk of mixing references to the base and
> the ports version in one binary (e.g. other libraries are linked in that
> had been built against the base version).
>
> Regards, STefan
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
