Finally I decided to manage all ports patches in my GitHub fork. I describe current status of the port:
- Upstream source is CRLF - patches in FILESDIR are LF because CRLF patches in svn repo should be marked as binary - To apply these patches, convert to LF using USE=dos2unix I believe this is common technique and now a few numbers of ports do so. The problem is adding a backport patch from upstream. I pick a git commit from upstream and add to PATCHFILES. Patching is done after dos2unix. Applying upstream patch to dos2unix-ed source will fail. So I wanted to apply CRLF patch before dos2unix, apply LF patches after dos2unix but current ports framework cannot do such hack. Finally I quit mixing CRLF patchs and LF patches. I commit ports patches to my GitHub fork of upstream product and fetch from there. This does not cause line-ending mismatch. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:23:58PM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to run dos2unix to patches fetched from PATCH_SITES? > or how can I change order of patch and dos2unix. > > I would like to apply dos2unix-ed patches to dos2unix-ed source. > Alternatively, applying patch first and then running dos2unix on > patched-source is OK to me. > > Patches fetched from PATCH_SITES have .patch suffix so I added *.patch > to DOS2UNIX_GLOB but it didn't work. > > USES= dos2unix > DOS2UNIX_GLOB= *.c *.h > > -- > meta <m...@freebsd.org> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- meta <m...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
