On 07/19/17 23:19, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:06:13PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
it was suggested multiple times that the whole fixinc step is
ultimately harmful and serves no useful purpose and probably should
be disabled in built packages outright. Is there a reason not to do
it? Even Redhat appears to do the slimming in their rpms:
For the more current lang/gcc* ports (not the gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux
ports which I do not maintain) I have now removed packaging the
headers processed by fixincludes, so any problems in that direction
should be gone.
Gerald
Thank you, Gerald!
This is very good news, thank you. Gcc should be much more usable now.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Do you have a patch/revision ID for this change? I would like to test
this with some
ports that gcc failed on.
--
Patrick Powell Astart Technologies
papow...@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X
Network and System San Diego, CA 92019
Consulting Cell 858-518-7581 FAX 858-751-2435
Web: papowell at astart dot com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
