On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > it was suggested multiple times that the whole fixinc step is > > ultimately harmful and serves no useful purpose and probably should > > be disabled in built packages outright. Is there a reason not to do > > it? Even Redhat appears to do the slimming in their rpms: > > For the more current lang/gcc* ports (not the gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux > ports which I do not maintain) I have now removed packaging the > headers processed by fixincludes, so any problems in that direction > should be gone. > > Gerald Thank you, Gerald! -- Alexander Kabaev
pgpxzoBOngxmA.pgp
Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
