On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 06:12:51PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:17:10PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:34:30PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:03:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > > Freebsd-ports could also use a wrapper: > > > > > > Yes. I have also suggested we use a wrapper to the ports guys. > > > > > > > I thought about this a bit, and cleaner solution might be > > to add the program suffix to libgcc_s.so.1. For example, > > > > % cat foo.f90 > > program foo > > print *, 'Hello' > > end program > > % gfortran6 -o z foo.f90 && ./z > > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by \ > > /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgfortran.so.3 not found > > % ldconfig -r | grep libgcc > > 6:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > > 735:-lgcc_s.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 > > > > Clearly, ldd is looking for 735 but finds 6. If the lang/gcc6 could > > be convinced to build, install, and use libgcc_s6.so.1, then the > > problem is solved without a wrapper. > > I like this solution. >
I have asked on g...@gcc.gnu.org if it is possible to configure gcc as above. I know that one can bump the shared lib number, but that won't solve the problem. -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
