On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:17:10PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:34:30PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:03:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > Freebsd-ports could also use a wrapper: > > > % cat ~/bin/gfc7 > > > #! /bin/sh > > > DIR=`id -P sgk | sed 's/\:/\ /g' | awk '{print $9}'` > > > export DIR > > > > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DIR/work/7/lib > > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > > > > > LD_RUN_PATH=$DIR/work/7/lib > > > export LD_RUN_PATH > > > > > > $DIR/work/7/bin/gfortran -fno-backtrace $@ > > > > Yes. I have also suggested we use a wrapper to the ports guys. > > > > I thought about this a bit, and cleaner solution might be > to add the program suffix to libgcc_s.so.1. For example, > > % cat foo.f90 > program foo > print *, 'Hello' > end program > % gfortran6 -o z foo.f90 && ./z > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by \ > /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgfortran.so.3 not found > % ldconfig -r | grep libgcc > 6:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > 735:-lgcc_s.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 > > Clearly, ldd is looking for 735 but finds 6. If the lang/gcc6 could > be convinced to build, install, and use libgcc_s6.so.1, then the > problem is solved without a wrapper.
I like this solution. > > -- > Steve > Diane -- - d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"