On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:58:37AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Are you going to keep support for the "old" way too? This is kinda crucial > for us (and possible other people) in order to properly build off-the-tree > (private) ports. Thanks! > Oh sure, it will be backward compatible. I will be transparent for all ports that are not flagged as flavors or subpackages.
We are not removing a feature, neither replacing one, just adding a new one so tools that work on the ports tree should learn about that new feature to not fail on them. Best regards, Bapt
pgpSDgKGC77wH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
