On Mon, 12 May 2014, John Marino wrote:
I commit PR patches that are 6 to 18 months old fairly frequently. There is obviously a huge backlog but many PRs are processed daily. The PRs that aren't getting processed quickly are "[NEW PORT]" PRs (and apparently anything mentioning fuse-fs for some reason). A staging PR is going to jump the line; it has a higher priority. Why would you even entertain the idea that a staging PR will fall between the cracks?
Perhaps the better question is: what are the factors that will make committers shy away from a PR, even if it's summary contains stage? [1] Maybe we (maintainers) can do better? [1] <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&severity=&priority=&class=maintainer-update&state=open&sort=none&text=&responsible=&multitext=stage&originator=&release=> -- Melvyn _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
