Do I understand this situation correctly: Users are having issues with building/installing packages with STAGEDIR enabled in lightweight jails that use symlinks to share parts of the base system between many jails to make it easier to upgrade the jails and avoid duplication/wasted disk space? It seems that the handbook and ezjails may both replicate this behavior.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/jails-application.html If this is correct, the only workaround may be for you to use a private package repository constructed by poudriere and to not actually build your packages within the jails you intend to use them in. The types of jails you are using are certainly a supported method for running jails, but I can see the severe limitations it imposes on the newer package building method which is designed to ensure packages are built as accurately and reliably as possible. Maybe bapt & co can find a workaround for this, but this does sound like an edge case. Please keep in mind that there are some growing pains as the ports team attempts to mature packages on FreeBSD so we can one day go from 90% users build from ports and only 10% using packages to a reality where 90% of the users are able to use packages and only 10% have to build from ports. I should note that I successfully run these types of jails but I run poudriere from the host to have private package repositories. It makes it very easy to pop into a jail and run "pkg upgrade" and instantly the jail is updated and I can restart services or quickly restart the entire jail. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
