Am 02/13/13 15:05, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi >> <yama...@kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote: >>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for >>>> instance >>>> >>>> # >>>> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ >>>> CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11 >>>> >>>> >>>> which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port >>>> grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options. >>>> >>>> As far a sI know, /etc/src.conf is ONLY for building the source tree of >>>> the operating system and make.conf is supposed to contain all stuff >>>> necessary for compiling both world and ports, but /etc/src.conf is world >>>> only. >>>> >>>> Am I wrong? >>>> >>>> Oliver >>>> >>> Yes. >>> Because files/Makefile.bsd includes <bsd.lib.mk>, >>> /etc/src.conf is included. >>> >>> >> >> src.conf(5) says: >> >> The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compilation of the FreeBSD >> source code, which is usually located in /usr/src. >> >> Cheers >> >> Tom > > If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use > bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from > the source tree? > > -Kimmo >
I would consider them broken! How could I track down problems if they are results of intermixed config files when the manpage explicitely tells me, that the /etc/src.conf is only for the build of the operating system?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
