On 08.01.2013 19:02, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm on the fence. It's true, that there is no low-print feature complete
equivalent for KDE3.
Worse, KDE4 is not only much heavier (which could've been acceptable).
It is also not compatible -- people like myself, who customized their
desktops with additional menus, who created knotes, etc. will have to
redo all of their settings. KDE4, as built, is not even going to look
under the ~/.kde. Though it can be compiled to consider the old
directory, the format/syntax for many of the config-files has changed --
and there is no "upgrade path".
On the other hand, if nobody wants to maintain Trinity, well
it should be letten go, as sooner or later there will be problems.
Before becoming "maintained", Trinity first needs to be ported -- a
substantial effort, because, for example, the project switched to its
own verstion Qt (Trinity Qt). All classes have been renamed from Qfoo to
TQfoo...
This can all be handled, but meanwhile, until there ARE actual problems,
leave the ports alone, please.
-mi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
