> I see the proposal less about *FreeBSD Ports Teams* and more about > *Non-FreeBSD* groups. We can only blame ourselves for having > non-responsive teams, or having *mailing lists* be maintainers. > > I see the benefit here more about allowing us to commit PR from any of > the listed addresses, as well as allow end-users to have more *people* > to contact.
I'd welcome a patch to allow multiple maintainers. It would be an enabling, Doesn't imply requirement to have multiple for all ports. Individual ports maintainers & users might feel different numbers of Maintainers were appropriate to different ports, a luxury to choose that FreeBSD hasn't offered till now. Could give faster response when prime=first maintainer is on holiday, or snowed under. As to list names used for Maintainer, That seems to remain a seperate policy not enabling technology issue, (assuming there's no auto detect on eg known list names). Though as some ports have mail list dedicated to one port, some human maintainers may want to add a list name as eg a secondary Maintainer, & some ports just with a list might get a human appended. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
