On 2012-09-12 00:50, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Like with Apache, x 11, or perl? > Trying to get something there committed it's like pulling tiger teeth with > a pair of pliers. return I agree multiple maintainers is a bad idea. > If someone is technical enough to want to maintain that, they can always > use an alias it goes to a group. > Oh, were talking to Apache x 11 or Perl again >
I see no reason for having multiple MAINTAINERS. Commit with implicit and if you like give a statement http://wiki.freebsd.org/MaintainerNotes about co-maintaining. I already wiped my eyes on this commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=304107 Or as Alberto already explained the reasons for a team form one. @Michael Trolling or experience? $> query-pr -c ports -r apache -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched $> query-pr -c ports -r perl -y scheidel -q oh, found two PR's for 4.11 and 5.5 $> query-pr -c ports -r x11 -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched -- Regards, olli _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
