On 11/06/2012 17:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on to >>>>> discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Bapt >>> >>> Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff >> >> Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere?
> No need except ports willing to have a custom PKGNAMEPREFIX but still wanted
> to
> have a custom prefix anyway.
>
> like
> PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
> PKGUNIQUEPREFIX= py-
>
> which is not mandatory but can help avoiding UNIQUENAME collision
Not PREFIX --- SUFFIX. You have:
UNIQUENAME?= ${PKGUNIQUENAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}${PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
or is this part of some cunning plan to do with sub-ports?
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
