On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:41:32PM -0400, Erwin Lansing wrote: > Hi, > > portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the ports to > improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework. The new framework > not only streamlines the current inconsistencies, but also adds new paradigms > like exclusive options, one-of-many, many-of-many, and more. > > All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG > > Documentation on how to use it available here > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/rendered/porters-optionsng.html#MAKEFILE-OPTIONS > > patch here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/optionsng.diff > > The two only ports that are known broken ghostscript8 and ghostscript9: > patch available here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/ghostscript-optionsng.patch > > I'd like to specially thanks crees for help on documentation. > > regards, > Bapt_______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
A bug was spotted by Bryan Drewery and has been fixed, http://people.freebsd.org/~portmgr/optionsng.diff has been updated. FYI the bug was: the option framework did take correctly the default values, when set with the old OPTIONS format. regards, Bapt
pgph2jH1AZZko.pgp
Description: PGP signature
