Chris Inacio <nacho...@gmail.com> wrote: > So let me see if I understand the conversation so far correctly: > > (*) If I want to detect it, then I would need something like a new library > name output from from fixbuf based on the build. (This currently doesn't > exist.)
New library name is not for detection; net/libfixbuf installs libfixbuf.so (and a bunch of related files), what you need is a separate port, net/libfixbuf-spread, that would compile libfixbuf with Spread support and install a separate library (so it would not conflict with the one net/libfixbuf installs), e.g. libfixbuf-spread.so. Then your port, net-mgmt/yaf, depending on the USE_SPREAD option, will either depend on net/libfixbuf and link with -lfixbuf, or will depend on net/libfixbuf-spread and will link with -lfixbuf-spread. > (*) I could do some split port, but (even being a noob) sounds pretty bad. It's not hard, and we can help you. > (*) There isn't a current method that directly queries build options from > one port to another. Right. > Am I capturing current state? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
