On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:15:23 -0500 Robert Huff <roberth...@rcn.com> wrote:
> > Doug Barton writes: > > > On 3/2/2012 11:06 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) > > > option, to have the remaining list of ports to be built still > > > continue processing even if one port's build fails? > > > > You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that > > "portmaster can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I > > have no way of knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as > > a result. > > But ... isn't this a case where you don't have to read minds? > It seems (to me) the user would be saying "I understand the risk, > and accept responsibility for dealing with the consequences.". At > that point, whether thet're right or wrong is not your problem .... > > > Robert Huff Yes, that's how I feel about it, myself, and it seems to have been the philosophy of the portupgrade author as well. Let the user shoot himself in the foot. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
