On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Michel Talon wrote:

My experience is that all FreeBSD ports tools are incredibly slow, be it portupgrade, portmaster, even the basic tools like pkg_version. Maybe it would help to recognize that such observations are perhaps not unrelated to the original poster comments.

I don't understand what you mean by that last sentence. OP was talking about the difficulty of using or merging alternate ports trees, AFAIR. Sorry about the topic drift; we can start a new thread if appropriate.

And of course now I see it: the OP also mentioned the delay in rebuilding INDEX after merging ports trees.

That was a problem back before the ports cluster built INDEX files for download, and there were Perl and other implementations that could rebuild a local index faster than the stock ports implementation. Can't recall exactly what they were. If still applicable, integrating those faster methods into the ports system would be a solid improvement.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to