2009/6/26 Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixma...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Chris Rees<utis...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> 2009/6/25 <per...@pluto.rain.com>: >>>> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and >>>> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"? >>>> >>>> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n. >>> >>> Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's short, should still tab-complete >>> from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than nls, i18n, or l10n. >> >> I was thinking intl, but your suggestion's better. > > Guys, you have been discussing the category *name* for eight days now > without reaching a consensus. This is becoming somewhat boring. Please > do not reinvent the wheel. Whether you like it or not, i18n is a well > established and widely accepted acronym. >
Very sorry, we'll shut up and have it YOUR way. Chris -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
