> Kitche wrote: >>> David Wolfskill wrote: >>> My experience was that ImageMagick did build, but it also put up a >>> little window with a message on it. So my feeling is that the OP is >>> correct, and that at least on some versions of FreeBSD (in my case 7.0) >>> that access to an X11 environment is required for the port to install. >> >> ImageMagick port does not require X to build for the user that is >> building >> it. Sounds like either your ports is corrupted or something deeper on >> your >> system is causing this issue. > > As you can see from my original log, X is used. > > X is not required, since it is not used, if I build with 'su -' instead > of 'su' (and thus have a clear environment without DISPLAY being set). > If the build tries to use X and is denied, the test fails. > > The port is not corrupted... just have a look at these two tests: > > /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.1/PerlMagick/t/x11/read.t > /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.1/PerlMagick/t/x11/write.t > > Jan Henrik > Hmm I seem to lost my files I must have did a make clean in the imagemagick port since I do have it installed. Well did, my ImageMagick just compiled fine though the tests in a TTY. Which is where I do most of my compiling anyways instead of inside a terminal in X. I m on 7.0 if that matters as well but I did see the test for X11 go by on my screen. maybe that is your issue maybe.
the whole Su and su - is not related to this it seems considering I can su to my root account and it works. I'll try compiling ImageMagick on X to see if an error occurs. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
