On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:03:18 -0400 Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> вівторок 15 квітень 2008 08:55 до, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Ви написали: > > Not quite. I also faced this, but was lucky to discover in time (not > > closing any open app) where this dependency was coming from. The only port > > I had to update was glib, a couple of times, and gio-fam was finally built. > > > This was instinctive, but worked. > > "A couple of times"? Congratulations... Thanks. > > One should not need this luck, nor this instinct, however. It wasn't luck, I usually upgrade a few ports before launching a bunch of upgrades. Glib build broke during some other port upgrade, and I checked what happened. Updated its dependencies, itself forcibly, and then resumed the other port. > > Until I decide to upgrade gnome, all other gnome-using ports should be > content > with the version of gnome I already have... > > This is all patently obvious, I might add. The automatic gio-fam dependency > should be made smarter and/or optional (depending on which gnome is already > installed). > > Going forward, one hopes, gnome-team will not be so cavalier in forcing > upgrades... How about working with the gnome-team instead of blaming them? I'd bet that if you had to upgrade Gnome by hand, you would be using KDE or something else. Shouting at gnome-team won't help at all. -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rnsanchez.wait4.org "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse." _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"