Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
an error for this port.
The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host?
OK, I found the difference. The port builds for all FreeBSD version
except 5.x. The same is for ports-mgmt/tinderbox. Thus I think that
there is something that was not MFS'd to 5-STABLE that causes the
difference.
For now I'm going to mark the port as IGNORE for OSVERSION < 600000.
A question to portmgr@: Do you have any objections?
It would be nice to know what exactly is going on in there.
Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be, unless it is using uname(1) or
(3) and 5.x doesn't have the environment variable overrides...but in
that case hundreds of other things would break.
I stepped a little bit further. Seems that the port (?) does not
respect UNAME_r at 5.x (I have only 5.4-STABLE to test at):
-----
# echo $UNAME_r
UNAME_r: Undefined variable.
# uname -srm
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386
# pwd
/usr/ports/devel/py-lxml
# make UNAME_r=9.0-FUTURE | grep freebsd
creating build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4
creating build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/lxml
copying src/lxml/_elementpath.py -> build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/lxml
copying src/lxml/ElementInclude.py -> build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/lxml
copying src/lxml/sax.py -> build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/lxml
copying src/lxml/__init__.py -> build/lib.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/lxml
creating build/temp.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4
creating build/temp.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/src
creating build/temp.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/src/lxml
cc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro
-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x20000 -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -fPIC
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2
-I/usr/local/include/python2.4 -c src/lxml/etree.c -o
build/temp.freebsd-5.4-STABLE-i386-2.4/src/lxml/etree.o -w
^C
interrupted
#
-----
Other FreeBSD versions (didn't check 6.x but assume the same):
-----
# echo $UNAME_r
UNAME_r: Undefined variable.
# uname -srm
FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT i386
# pwd
/usr/ports/devel/py-lxml
# make UNAME_r=9.0-FUTURE | grep freebsd
creating build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5
creating build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/sax.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/builder.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/htmlbuilder.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/_elementpath.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/__init__.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
copying src/lxml/ElementInclude.py -> build/lib.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/lxml
creating build/temp.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5
creating build/temp.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/src
creating build/temp.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/src/lxml
cc -DNDEBUG -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D__wchar_t=wchar_t
-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x20000 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fPIC
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2
-I/usr/local/include/python2.5 -c src/lxml/etree.c -o
build/temp.freebsd-9.0-FUTURE-i386-2.5/src/lxml/etree.o -w
^Cinterrupted
#
-----
The same results are for adding "MAKE_ENV+= UNAME_r=9.0-FUTURE" to
the port's Makefile.
Yes, 5.4 is likely too old. How about 5.5?
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
