on 08/12/2007 01:52 Garrett Cooper said the following: > On Dec 7, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> Here is an idea. I notice that the extra sources you want to >> download are rather small (about 7000 bytes when zipped). How >> about if you put the sources into the "files" subdirectory of the >> port itself, and then the port doesn't have to download anything >> extra. >> >> So, for example, the portlint port comes complete with full >> sources, adding up to nearly 100,000 bytes in its "files" >> subdirectory. So adding 7000 bytes to a port is going to be small >> by comparison. > > > No dice on that I think. It's artistic license, which means (AFAIK) > that it can't be distributed with the ports tree as it's not BSD > licensed code.
Well, actually the file in question in by me and is under 3-clause BSD license. But I am a little bit reluctant to 'pollute' ports tree with C sources that don't have to be there. It's only from philosophical point of view, no technical reasons. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
