On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:52 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 07/12/2007 15:50 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> So I have this solution worth of Solomon's wisdom :-) > >>> It is to add an option to the port, say with WITH_FUSE. When the > >>> option > >>> is turned on the port would download my sources in addition to the > >>> original sources, then modify the build scripts, patch the original > >>> sources and build an additional program udfclientfs. Updating > >>> plist and > >>> dependencies would also be done, of course. > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118484 > >> Please comment. > > > > > > Here is an idea. I notice that the extra sources you want to > > download are rather small (about 7000 bytes when zipped). How > > about if you put the sources into the "files" subdirectory of the > > port itself, and then the port doesn't have to download anything > > extra. > > > > So, for example, the portlint port comes complete with full > > sources, adding up to nearly 100,000 bytes in its "files" > > subdirectory. So adding 7000 bytes to a port is going to be small > > by comparison. > > > No dice on that I think. It's artistic license, which means (AFAIK) > that it can't be distributed with the ports tree as it's not BSD > licensed code. > -Garrett
The patch itself has a BSD license on it. That said, just because a patch is not BSD licensed doesn't preclude it from living in the ports tree. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
