On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 06:00:02PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote: > On Thu 13 Sep 2007 14:09, Gergely S???nta wrote: > > Hi! I'm a developer using gvim with it's tagging through exctags > > (somehow ctags never worked for me). As vim port have no > > configuration options, it can't be configured easyly through 'make > > config'. I'm too lazy for digging Makefile for options every time I > > compile new version of vim, I added configuration options to > > Makefile. I'm new to FreeBSD, also to it's Ports, so maybe I don't > > see the reasons, these options aren't in the Makefile, but maybe they > > should be there. Anyway, I attach my change, maybe it will be > > acceptable to have it's way to ports. And if not, maybe it will help > > for someone else too :) .. > > +OPTIONS= PERL "Enable Perl interpreter" off \
I appreciate a patch being sent in. But, sorry no - I am one of those that do not care for our current OPTIONS implementation. Note that I don't believe the build options have changed for Vim for the past 4 years. I simply put them in /etc/make.conf once, and I have them for all my Vim builds. Patches that make it easier to document the WITH_ knobs are appreciated. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
