On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
You should try to work closely with the FreeBSD port maintainer for sysutils/syslog-ng to integrate 2.x into a Port. Unless there is a liscencing restriction I don't know preventing a enw sysutils/ syslog-ng2/ port, we're still at 1.6.11 in Ports.
I am still evaluating whether I will be using this software in our infrastructure. If I do (which seems likely), I plan to adopt the port once 2.0 is released. I don't see a compelling reason to keep a separate 2.0 version of the port as it is back-compatible, and I believe that the base port name, syslog-ng, should be the latest version always. That's how I maintain the postfix port, too :-)
