VK:
I'd be happy to test a beta of the port for Endian issues on Sparc64 and
AMD64. I've also got a variety of 5x and 6x boxes on both archs on which
I can smash bugs.
Just gotta cane `em.
I can also do the NetBSD pkgsrc work in pkgsrc-wip.sf.net
~BAS
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
You should try to work closely with the FreeBSD port maintainer for
sysutils/syslog-ng to integrate 2.x into a Port. Unless there is a
liscencing restriction I don't know preventing a enw sysutils/syslog-ng2/
port, we're still at 1.6.11 in Ports.
I am still evaluating whether I will be using this software in our
infrastructure. If I do (which seems likely), I plan to adopt the port once
2.0 is released. I don't see a compelling reason to keep a separate 2.0
version of the port as it is back-compatible, and I believe that the base
port name, syslog-ng, should be the latest version always. That's how I
maintain the postfix port, too :-)
l8*
-lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA)
http://www.spiritual-machines.org/
"...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota"
meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages
of laser printout - and frequently were."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
