On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:10:15 +0200
Marcus von Appen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> No, it won't, if I see that right.
>
> DIRFB "Include support for DirectFB" Off \
>
> and
> .if defined(WITH_DIRECTFB)
> LIB_DEPENDS+= directfb-0.9.16:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
> ...
>
> will not do the wanted stuff. Basically the patch set of ports/99943 (you
> used it partially for devel/sdl12) is broken in several ways.
>
> I did not have the time to check the complete patch set for now (still
> setting up a jail for testing), but as soon as it is done (tomorrow or
> so), I'll post a revised set, which incorporates my changes for
> devel/sdl12.
>
> My changes for devel/sdl12 do not differ from your changes that much
> however.
> Thank for your review. I've updated patch (i've missed some issues in previous) and will upload it tomorrow. I would be glad to see your modifications here, since I've not tested directfb/aalib feature yet. I can be able to run test only on Sat., so if you could do it earlier, it will be highly appreciated. Thanks for your work! -- Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Россия, Москва http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
