On, Thu Aug 31, 2006, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:10:15 +0200
> Marcus von Appen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > No, it won't, if I see that right.
> >
> > DIRFB "Include support for DirectFB" Off \
> >
> > and
> > .if defined(WITH_DIRECTFB)
> > LIB_DEPENDS+= directfb-0.9.16:${PORTSDIR}/devel/directfb
> > ...
> >
> > will not do the wanted stuff. Basically the patch set of ports/99943 (you
> > used it partially for devel/sdl12) is broken in several ways.
> >
> > I did not have the time to check the complete patch set for now (still
> > setting up a jail for testing), but as soon as it is done (tomorrow or
> > so), I'll post a revised set, which incorporates my changes for
> > devel/sdl12.
> >
> > My changes for devel/sdl12 do not differ from your changes that much
> > however.
> >
>
> Thank for your review. I've updated patch (i've missed some issues
> in previous) and will upload it tomorrow. I would be glad to see
> your modifications here, since I've not tested directfb/aalib
> feature yet.Why do you place the examples beneath PORTDOCS (default /usr/locals/share/doc) and not into EXAMPLESDIR as done before (default /usr/local/share/examples)? > I can be able to run test only on Sat., so if you could do it > earlier, it will be highly appreciated. I guess, I can post it tomorrow (Friday). Regards Marcus
pgp9s7VYtFpDy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
