On 2016-08-10 06:24, krad wrote:
true its not elegant though is it, as ultimately it will want to be
integrated into a standard patching schedule. I just want to make sure i'm
not missing something, or its just in the pipeline. Maybe the svn revision
number could be embedded into the package version ?
The build date is appended to the version number:
# pkg info -xf FreeBSD-kernel
FreeBSD-kernel-generic-12.0.s20160726192118
Name : FreeBSD-kernel-generic
Version : 12.0.s20160726192118
Installed on : Tue Jul 26 20:21:48 2016 UTC
Origin : base
Architecture : freebsd:12:x86:64
Prefix : /
Categories : base
Licenses : BSD2CLAUSE
Maintainer : r...@freebsd.org
WWW : https://www.FreeBSD.org
Comment : FreeBSD GENERIC kernel
Annotations :
repo_type : binary
repository : FreeBSD-base
Flat size : 108MiB
Description :
FreeBSD GENERIC kernel
Is this not the case in 11-stable?
On 10 August 2016 at 13:54, Henry Vogt <henry.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
Am 10.08.16 um 14:21 schrieb krad:
Hi, I am currently testing pkgbase on a few jails and have setup my own
repo for the base OS package files. This is working fine at a certain
level
however I have noticed if i do an interim build of freebsd 11-stable from
svn, the base packages dont get updated via pkgbase even though the repo
files have newly build packages. I'm guess this is because the version of
the packages currently is 11.0, so nothing will get updated until they
are
bumped to 11.1. Is there any way to modify this behaviour so that interim
builds are captured, as I mostly do weekly builds of stable?
You can always force a re-install using
pkg -f -r <your_repo>
Best
Henry
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pkgbase
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pkgbase-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
