true its not elegant though is it, as ultimately it will want to be integrated into a standard patching schedule. I just want to make sure i'm not missing something, or its just in the pipeline. Maybe the svn revision number could be embedded into the package version ?
On 10 August 2016 at 13:54, Henry Vogt <henry.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 10.08.16 um 14:21 schrieb krad: > > Hi, I am currently testing pkgbase on a few jails and have setup my own > > repo for the base OS package files. This is working fine at a certain > level > > however I have noticed if i do an interim build of freebsd 11-stable from > > svn, the base packages dont get updated via pkgbase even though the repo > > files have newly build packages. I'm guess this is because the version of > > the packages currently is 11.0, so nothing will get updated until they > are > > bumped to 11.1. Is there any way to modify this behaviour so that interim > > builds are captured, as I mostly do weekly builds of stable? > > > > You can always force a re-install using > > pkg -f -r <your_repo> > > Best > Henry > > > -- > Henry Vogt <henry.v...@gmail.com> Tel. ++49(0)7471/931158 > *Please* use <h...@tuebingen.mpg.de> for MPI Job related mail (only). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pkgbase > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pkgbase-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pkgbase To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pkgbase-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
