Dnia piÄ…tek, 19 czerwca 2015 11:38:10 Chuck @ Mantis pisze:
> Our data center responded to your question, here is the text:
> 
> We can confirm that the new netblock is routed direct via your vlan as with
> your original netblock
> 
> VLAN: vlan655-cbcbmedi-809, Created at: Mon Oct 20 13:42:05 2014
> 802.1Q Tag: 655, Internal index: 205, Admin State: Enabled, Origin: Static
> Layer 3 interface: vlan.655 (UP)
>   IPV4 addresses:
>                  60.34.75.209/28
>                  79.112.227.33/27
> Protocol: Port Mode, Mac aging time: 300 seconds
> Number of interfaces: Tagged 0 (Active = 0), Untagged  1 (Active = 1)
>        ge-5/0/20.0*, untagged, access
> 

Just add another subnet and hosts in it (carp?) to the usual interface and use 
the existing gateway, it should work just fine. Both gateways are the same 
device which will happily accept traffic from any source.

Or start using real routing.

-- 
| pozdrawiam / greetings | powered by Debian, FreeBSD and CentOS |
|  Kajetan Staszkiewicz  | jabber,email: vegeta()tuxpowered net  |
|        Vegeta          | www: http://vegeta.tuxpowered.net     |
`------------------------^---------------------------------------'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to